Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Osawa, Hideaki; Hirose, Yukio*; Otomo, Shoji*; Onuma, Susumu*
Nihon Risuku Kenkyu Gakkai-Shi (Internet), 31(3), p.235 - 247, 2022/03
This study examined effects of a management policy and of site selection process for high-level radioactive waste disposal on acceptance of siting repository in a German case. Data from 1,000 German residents, assigned by population composition ratio of 16 states, were collected in 2018 by internet survey. We assumed three steps of acceptance: management policy, site selection process, and siting repository. We also hypothesized national consensus of the former two steps were relevant factors on the acceptances. Results indicated that national consensus of site selection process directly had an effect on acceptance of siting repository, while acceptance and national consensus of management policy had an effect on national consensus of site selection process. In addition, acceptances of management policy and site selection process had effects on procedural and interpersonal fairness, while national consensus of management policy and site selection process as well as acceptance of site selection had effects on distributive fairness.
Osawa, Hideaki; Otomo, Shoji*; Onuma, Susumu*; Hirose, Yukio*
Shakai Gijutsu Kenkyu Rombunshu, 13, p.86 - 95, 2016/05
This study examined determinants of public acceptance regarding siting a geological disposal facility for high-level radioactive waste (HLW) in France, where a candidate site has been selected following on a variety of public involvement activities. Data from 886 French residents were collected in 2014 by an internet survey that was performed near a district that is a candidate for a HLW repository and in an outlying region away from the candidate site. Results indicate that procedural fairness, intergenerational subjective norm, public benefit and personal benefit were significant factors for public acceptance in dealing with the NIMBY issue in addition to factors such as trust, risk perception and stigma, dealt with in previous research on risk analysis. Furthermore, personal benefit and affect had stronger impact on the acceptance than public benefit, procedural fairness and intergenerational subjective norm.
Sobajima, Makoto
Genshiryoku eye, 44(11), p.54 - 59, 1998/11
no abstracts in English
Osawa, Hideaki
no journal, ,
This presentation introduce the summarised results on the determinants of public acceptance of geological disposal facility.
Onuma, Susumu*; Hirose, Yukio*; Osawa, Hideaki; Otomo, Shoji*
no journal, ,
This abstract shows the summarized results of internet survey on determinants of public acceptance of waste disposal for high-level radioactive waste in the UK.
Osawa, Hideaki
no journal, ,
This presentation introduces the effort toward public acceptance for geological disposal of high-level radioactive waste in Switzerland, UK and France.
Onuma, Susumu*; Yokoyama, Miki*; Hirose, Yukio*; Osawa, Hideaki; Otomo, Shoji*
no journal, ,
This presentation shows effect of procedural fairness by the veil of ignorance on public acceptance.
Osawa, Hideaki; Onuma, Susumu*
no journal, ,
A hypothetical scenario experiment was conducted to examine the effects of the site selection procedure (public invitation/offer procedure, screening procedure) on the associations of acceptance of geological disposal facility of high-level radioactive waste and the antecedent factors. The results showed that intergenerational subjective norm had a greater impact on acceptance of the facility in the screening procedure than in the public invitation/offer procedure, while social benefit had no impact on acceptance of the facility. In addition, personal benefit had a negative impact on acceptance of the facility in the public invitation/offer procedure.
